2002 Toyota Mega Cruiser vs. 1963 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2002 Toyota Mega Cruiser is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 4,164 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Toyota Mega Cruiser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Toyota Mega Cruiser (154 HP @ 3200 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 1963 Triumph 2000. (130 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Toyota Mega Cruiser should accelerate faster than 1963 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Toyota Mega Cruiser weights approximately 1655 kg more than 1963 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Toyota Mega Cruiser (391 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 193 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Triumph 2000. (198 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2002 Toyota Mega Cruiser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Toyota Mega Cruiser | 1963 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Toyota | Triumph |
| Model | Mega Cruiser | 2000 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4164 cc | 2498 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 154 HP | 130 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 391 Nm | 198 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2850 kg | 1195 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5140 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2180 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2290 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3400 mm | 2700 mm |
