2002 Toyota Pod vs. 2013 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac CTS is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Toyota Pod. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Toyota Pod would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac CTS (314 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 120 more horse power than 2002 Toyota Pod. (194 HP @ 3400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 2002 Toyota Pod. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 838 kg more than 2002 Toyota Pod. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Toyota Pod, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Toyota Pod (430 Nm) has 57 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Cadillac CTS. (373 Nm). This means 2002 Toyota Pod will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Cadillac CTS.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Toyota Pod | 2013 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | Toyota | Cadillac |
| Model | Pod | CTS |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1495 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 194 HP | 314 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 6800 RPM |
| Torque | 430 Nm | 373 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 940 kg | 1778 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3940 mm | 4859 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1842 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1860 mm | 1473 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2880 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 48 L | 68 L |
