2002 Toyota Sienna vs. 1963 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2002 Toyota Sienna is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 2,995 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Toyota Sienna is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Toyota Sienna (197 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 67 more horse power than 1963 Triumph 2000. (130 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Toyota Sienna should accelerate faster than 1963 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Toyota Sienna weights approximately 510 kg more than 1963 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Toyota Sienna (283 Nm @ 4300 RPM) has 85 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Triumph 2000. (198 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2002 Toyota Sienna will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Toyota Sienna | 1963 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Toyota | Triumph |
| Model | Sienna | 2000 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2995 cc | 2498 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 130 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 283 Nm | 198 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4300 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 87.6 mm | 74.8 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 83 mm | 95 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1705 kg | 1195 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1720 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2700 mm |
