2002 Toyota Sienna vs. 2010 Saturn Outlook
To start off, 2010 Saturn Outlook is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Toyota Sienna. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Toyota Sienna would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Saturn Outlook is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Saturn Outlook (277 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 80 more horse power than 2002 Toyota Sienna. (197 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Saturn Outlook should accelerate faster than 2002 Toyota Sienna.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Toyota Sienna (283 Nm @ 4300 RPM) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Saturn Outlook. (253 Nm @ 5500 RPM). This means 2002 Toyota Sienna will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Saturn Outlook.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Toyota Sienna | 2010 Saturn Outlook | |
Make | Toyota | Saturn |
Model | Sienna | Outlook |
Year Released | 2002 | 2010 |
Body Type | Minivan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2995 cc | 3564 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 277 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 283 Nm | 253 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4300 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 11.4:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1990 mm |