2002 Toyota Tundra vs. 2003 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2003 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Toyota Tundra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Toyota Tundra would be higher. At 4,698 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Toyota Tundra (245 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 68 more horse power than 2003 Nissan X-Trail. (177 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 2003 Nissan X-Trail. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Nissan X-Trail weights approximately 481 kg more than 2002 Toyota Tundra.
Because 2003 Nissan X-Trail is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Toyota Tundra. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Nissan X-Trail will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Toyota Tundra (427 Nm) has 182 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Nissan X-Trail. (245 Nm). This means 2002 Toyota Tundra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Nissan X-Trail.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Toyota Tundra | 2003 Nissan X-Trail | |
Make | Toyota | Nissan |
Model | Tundra | X-Trail |
Year Released | 2002 | 2003 |
Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4698 cc | 2488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 245 HP | 177 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 427 Nm | 245 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 923 kg | 1404 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3270 mm | 2660 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 60 L |