2002 Toyota Tundra vs. 2012 Koenigsegg Agera
To start off, 2012 Koenigsegg Agera is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Toyota Tundra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Toyota Tundra would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Koenigsegg Agera is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Koenigsegg Agera (1,100 HP) has 913 more horse power than 2002 Toyota Tundra. (187 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Koenigsegg Agera should accelerate faster than 2002 Toyota Tundra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 430 kg more than 2012 Koenigsegg Agera.
Because 2002 Toyota Tundra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Koenigsegg Agera. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Toyota Tundra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Toyota Tundra | 2012 Koenigsegg Agera | |
| Make | Toyota | Koenigsegg |
| Model | Tundra | Agera |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 3400 cc | 5000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 187 HP | 1100 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Biofuel |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1720 kg | 1290 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5530 mm | 4293 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1996 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1800 mm | 1120 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3270 mm | 2660 mm |
