2002 TVR T 350 vs. 2008 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2008 Holden Commodore is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 TVR T 350. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 TVR T 350 would be higher. At 3,996 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 TVR T 350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 TVR T 350 (345 HP) has 105 more horse power than 2008 Holden Commodore. (240 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2002 TVR T 350 should accelerate faster than 2008 Holden Commodore.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 TVR T 350 (391 Nm) has 151 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Holden Commodore. (240 Nm). This means 2002 TVR T 350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Holden Commodore.
Compare all specifications:
2002 TVR T 350 | 2008 Holden Commodore | |
Make | TVR | Holden |
Model | T 350 | Commodore |
Year Released | 2002 | 2008 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3996 cc | 2564 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 345 HP | 240 HP |
Torque | 391 Nm | 240 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |