2002 Volkswagen 1 Litre vs. 1965 Ford Zodiac
To start off, 2002 Volkswagen 1 Litre is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Ford Zodiac. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Ford Zodiac would be higher. At 2,553 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 Ford Zodiac is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Ford Zodiac (108 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 100 more horse power than 2002 Volkswagen 1 Litre. (8 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1965 Ford Zodiac should accelerate faster than 2002 Volkswagen 1 Litre.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Volkswagen 1 Litre | 1965 Ford Zodiac | |
| Make | Volkswagen | Ford |
| Model | 1 Litre | Zodiac |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 297 cc | 2553 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 8 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4750 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3650 mm | 4650 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1250 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1450 mm |
