2002 Volkswagen 1 Litre vs. 2003 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2003 Cadillac CTS is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Volkswagen 1 Litre. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Volkswagen 1 Litre would be higher. At 2,597 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Cadillac CTS (179 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 171 more horse power than 2002 Volkswagen 1 Litre. (8 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 2002 Volkswagen 1 Litre.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Volkswagen 1 Litre | 2003 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | Volkswagen | Cadillac |
| Model | 1 Litre | CTS |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 297 cc | 2597 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 8 HP | 179 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3650 mm | 4840 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1250 mm | 1800 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1450 mm |
