2002 Volkswagen 1 Litre vs. 2009 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2009 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Volkswagen 1 Litre. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Volkswagen 1 Litre would be higher. At 1,390 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Volkswagen Polo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Volkswagen Polo (83 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 75 more horse power than 2002 Volkswagen 1 Litre. (8 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Volkswagen Polo should accelerate faster than 2002 Volkswagen 1 Litre.
Because 2002 Volkswagen 1 Litre is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Volkswagen 1 Litre. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Volkswagen Polo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2002 Volkswagen 1 Litre has automatic transmission and 2009 Volkswagen Polo has manual transmission. 2009 Volkswagen Polo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Volkswagen 1 Litre will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Volkswagen 1 Litre | 2009 Volkswagen Polo | |
Make | Volkswagen | Volkswagen |
Model | 1 Litre | Polo |
Year Released | 2002 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 297 cc | 1390 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 8 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3650 mm | 4200 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1250 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1470 mm |