2002 Volkswagen Magellan vs. 1975 Volvo 240

To start off, 2002 Volkswagen Magellan is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Volvo 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Volvo 240 would be higher. At 1,986 cc (4 cylinders), 1975 Volvo 240 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Volkswagen Magellan (275 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 194 more horse power than 1975 Volvo 240. (81 HP @ 4700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Volkswagen Magellan should accelerate faster than 1975 Volvo 240. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Volkswagen Magellan weights approximately 9 kg more than 1975 Volvo 240. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1975 Volvo 240 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1975 Volvo 240. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Volkswagen Magellan, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Volkswagen Magellan (310 Nm) has 153 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Volvo 240. (157 Nm). This means 2002 Volkswagen Magellan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Volvo 240.

Compare all specifications: