2002 Volkswagen Magellan vs. 2003 Volvo V50
To start off, 2003 Volvo V50 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Volkswagen Magellan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Volkswagen Magellan would be higher. At 2,521 cc (5 cylinders), 2003 Volvo V50 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Volkswagen Magellan (275 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 141 more horse power than 2003 Volvo V50. (134 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Volkswagen Magellan should accelerate faster than 2003 Volvo V50. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Volvo V50 weights approximately 89 kg more than 2002 Volkswagen Magellan.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Volkswagen Magellan (310 Nm) has 90 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Volvo V50. (220 Nm). This means 2002 Volkswagen Magellan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Volvo V50.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Volkswagen Magellan | 2003 Volvo V50 | |
| Make | Volkswagen | Volvo |
| Model | Magellan | V50 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1896 cc | 2521 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | W | in-line |
| Horse Power | 275 HP | 134 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 310 Nm | 220 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1349 kg | 1438 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4520 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2760 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 62 L |
