2002 Volkswagen Magellan vs. 2010 Cadillac BLS
To start off, 2010 Cadillac BLS is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Volkswagen Magellan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Volkswagen Magellan would be higher. At 1,998 cc, 2010 Cadillac BLS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Volkswagen Magellan (275 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 99 more horse power than 2010 Cadillac BLS. (176 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Volkswagen Magellan should accelerate faster than 2010 Cadillac BLS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Cadillac BLS weights approximately 217 kg more than 2002 Volkswagen Magellan.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Volkswagen Magellan (310 Nm) has 45 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Cadillac BLS. (265 Nm). This means 2002 Volkswagen Magellan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Cadillac BLS.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Volkswagen Magellan | 2010 Cadillac BLS | |
| Make | Volkswagen | Cadillac |
| Model | Magellan | BLS |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1896 cc | 1998 cc |
| Horse Power | 275 HP | 176 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 310 Nm | 265 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1349 kg | 1566 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4690 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1460 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1770 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2680 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 58 L |
