2002 Volkswagen Magellan vs. 2010 Volvo V70
To start off, 2010 Volvo V70 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Volkswagen Magellan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Volkswagen Magellan would be higher. At 3,192 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Volvo V70 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Volkswagen Magellan (275 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 2010 Volvo V70. (232 HP @ 6200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Volkswagen Magellan should accelerate faster than 2010 Volvo V70.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Volkswagen Magellan (310 Nm) has 74 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Volvo V70. (236 Nm). This means 2002 Volkswagen Magellan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Volvo V70.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Volkswagen Magellan | 2010 Volvo V70 | |
| Make | Volkswagen | Volvo |
| Model | Magellan | V70 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1896 cc | 3192 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | W | in-line |
| Horse Power | 275 HP | 232 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6200 RPM |
| Torque | 310 Nm | 236 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4480 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1870 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1550 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2820 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 60 L |
