2002 Volkswagen Phaeton vs. 1976 Zastava 1300

To start off, 2002 Volkswagen Phaeton is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Zastava 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Zastava 1300 would be higher. At 5,998 cc (12 cylinders), 2002 Volkswagen Phaeton is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Volkswagen Phaeton (414 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 355 more horse power than 1976 Zastava 1300. (59 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Volkswagen Phaeton should accelerate faster than 1976 Zastava 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Volkswagen Phaeton weights approximately 1330 kg more than 1976 Zastava 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2002 Volkswagen Phaeton is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1976 Zastava 1300. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Volkswagen Phaeton will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Volkswagen Phaeton (550 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 457 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Zastava 1300. (93 Nm @ 3100 RPM). This means 2002 Volkswagen Phaeton will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Zastava 1300. 2002 Volkswagen Phaeton has automatic transmission and 1976 Zastava 1300 has manual transmission. 1976 Zastava 1300 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Volkswagen Phaeton will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: