2002 Volkswagen Phaeton vs. 2013 Ford C-MAX

To start off, 2013 Ford C-MAX is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Volkswagen Phaeton. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Volkswagen Phaeton would be higher. At 3,189 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Volkswagen Phaeton is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Volkswagen Phaeton (237 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 98 more horse power than 2013 Ford C-MAX. (139 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Volkswagen Phaeton should accelerate faster than 2013 Ford C-MAX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Volkswagen Phaeton weights approximately 380 kg more than 2013 Ford C-MAX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2002 Volkswagen Phaeton is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Volkswagen Phaeton. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Ford C-MAX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Volkswagen Phaeton (320 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 145 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Ford C-MAX. (175 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2002 Volkswagen Phaeton will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Ford C-MAX.

Compare all specifications:

2002 Volkswagen Phaeton 2013 Ford C-MAX
Make Volkswagen Ford
Model Phaeton C-MAX
Year Released 2002 2013
Body Type Sedan Crossover
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3189 cc 2000 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 237 HP 139 HP
Engine RPM 6200 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 320 Nm 175 Nm
Torque RPM 2400 RPM 4000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 84 mm 87 mm
Engine Stroke Size 95.9 mm 83 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 11.3:1 12.3:1
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Automatic CVT
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 2035 kg 1655 kg
Vehicle Length 5060 mm 4409 mm
Vehicle Width 1910 mm 2085 mm
Vehicle Height 1460 mm 1623 mm
Wheelbase Size 2890 mm 2649 mm
Fuel Consumption Highway 9.3 L/100km 5 L/100km
Fuel Consumption City 17.1 L/100km 5 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 90 L 51 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]