2002 Volkswagen Phaeton vs. 2013 Ford C-MAX
To start off, 2013 Ford C-MAX is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Volkswagen Phaeton. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Volkswagen Phaeton would be higher. At 3,189 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Volkswagen Phaeton is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Volkswagen Phaeton (237 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 98 more horse power than 2013 Ford C-MAX. (139 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Volkswagen Phaeton should accelerate faster than 2013 Ford C-MAX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Volkswagen Phaeton weights approximately 380 kg more than 2013 Ford C-MAX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 Volkswagen Phaeton is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Volkswagen Phaeton. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Ford C-MAX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Volkswagen Phaeton (320 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 145 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Ford C-MAX. (175 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2002 Volkswagen Phaeton will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Ford C-MAX.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Volkswagen Phaeton | 2013 Ford C-MAX | |
Make | Volkswagen | Ford |
Model | Phaeton | C-MAX |
Year Released | 2002 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3189 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 237 HP | 139 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 320 Nm | 175 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 95.9 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.3:1 | 12.3:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | CVT |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2035 kg | 1655 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 4409 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 2085 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1623 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2649 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 9.3 L/100km | 5 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 17.1 L/100km | 5 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 51 L |