2002 Volvo C70 vs. 2004 Volvo C70
To start off, 2004 Volvo C70 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Volvo C70. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Volvo C70 would be higher. Both 2002 Volvo C70 and 2004 Volvo C70 are equipped with a 1,984 cc engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Volvo C70 (162 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 2004 Volvo C70. (161 HP @ 5100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Volvo C70 should accelerate faster than 2004 Volvo C70.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 230 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Volvo C70 | 2004 Volvo C70 | |
Make | Volvo | Volvo |
Model | C70 | C70 |
Year Released | 2002 | 2004 |
Body Type | Convertible | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1984 cc | 1984 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 162 HP | 161 HP |
Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Torque | 230 Nm | 230 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 81 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 77 mm | 77 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 9.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 1400 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 4730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2670 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 68 L |