2002 Volvo S60 vs. 2004 Mazda AZ
To start off, 2004 Mazda AZ is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Volvo S60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Volvo S60 would be higher. At 2,435 cc (5 cylinders), 2002 Volvo S60 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Volvo S60 weights approximately 701 kg more than 2004 Mazda AZ.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Volvo S60 | 2004 Mazda AZ | |
| Make | Volvo | Mazda |
| Model | S60 | AZ |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Station Wagon |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2435 cc | 657 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 295 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1451 kg | 750 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 3400 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2370 mm |
