2002 Volvo S80 vs. 2013 Ford E-Series

To start off, 2013 Ford E-Series is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Volvo S80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Volvo S80 would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Ford E-Series is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Ford E-Series (222 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 2002 Volvo S80. (197 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Ford E-Series should accelerate faster than 2002 Volvo S80. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Ford E-Series weights approximately 1146 kg more than 2002 Volvo S80. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2013 Ford E-Series is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Ford E-Series. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Volvo S80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Ford E-Series (387 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 107 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Volvo S80. (280 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 2013 Ford E-Series will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Volvo S80.

Compare all specifications:

2002 Volvo S80 2013 Ford E-Series
Make Volvo Ford
Model S80 E-Series
Year Released 2002 2013
Body Type Sedan Van
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2524 cc 4600 cc
Engine Cylinders 5 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 197 HP 222 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 4800 RPM
Torque 280 Nm 387 Nm
Torque RPM 1800 RPM 3500 RPM
Engine Bore Size 83 mm 90 mm
Engine Stroke Size 90 mm 90 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.0:1 9.38:1
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Automatic 4-speed automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 8 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 3 doors
Vehicle Weight 1465 kg 2611 kg
Vehicle Length 4830 mm 5504 mm
Vehicle Width 1840 mm 2017 mm
Vehicle Height 1440 mm 2085 mm
Wheelbase Size 2720 mm 3505 mm
Fuel Consumption 7.6 L/100km 14.7 L/100km
Fuel Consumption City 10.2 L/100km 18.1 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 80 L 150 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]