2002 Volvo V70 vs. 2013 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2013 Ford Mustang is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Volvo V70. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Volvo V70 would be higher. At 5,800 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Ford Mustang (653 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 456 more horse power than 2002 Volvo V70. (197 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2002 Volvo V70. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Ford Mustang weights approximately 56 kg more than 2002 Volvo V70. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 Volvo V70 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Ford Mustang. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Volvo V70 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Ford Mustang (856 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 576 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Volvo V70. (280 Nm @ 1600 RPM). This means 2013 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Volvo V70.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Volvo V70 | 2013 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Volvo | Ford |
Model | V70 | Mustang |
Year Released | 2002 | 2013 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2435 cc | 5800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 653 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 280 Nm | 856 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 93 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 105 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1692 kg | 1748 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 4778 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 2035 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1438 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2720 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 66 L | 61 L |