2002 Volvo XC90 vs. 2010 Citroen C6
To start off, 2010 Citroen C6 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Volvo XC90. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Volvo XC90 would be higher. At 2,946 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Citroen C6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Citroen C6 (209 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 2002 Volvo XC90. (160 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Citroen C6 should accelerate faster than 2002 Volvo XC90. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Volvo XC90 weights approximately 299 kg more than 2010 Citroen C6.
Because 2002 Volvo XC90 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Citroen C6. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Volvo XC90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Volvo XC90 (351 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 61 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Citroen C6. (290 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 2002 Volvo XC90 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Citroen C6.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Volvo XC90 | 2010 Citroen C6 | |
Make | Volvo | Citroen |
Model | XC90 | C6 |
Year Released | 2002 | 2010 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2435 cc | 2946 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 209 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 351 Nm | 290 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 93.2 mm | 82.6 mm |
Top Speed | 185 km/hour | 230 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 12.3 seconds | 10 seconds |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2114 kg | 1815 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2910 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.1 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 72 L |