2002 Volvo XC90 vs. 2011 Lexus RX
To start off, 2011 Lexus RX is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Volvo XC90. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Volvo XC90 would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Lexus RX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Lexus RX (275 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 115 more horse power than 2002 Volvo XC90. (160 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Lexus RX should accelerate faster than 2002 Volvo XC90. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Volvo XC90 weights approximately 219 kg more than 2011 Lexus RX.
Because 2002 Volvo XC90 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Lexus RX. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Volvo XC90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Volvo XC90 (351 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Lexus RX. (348 Nm @ 4700 RPM). This means 2002 Volvo XC90 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Lexus RX.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Volvo XC90 | 2011 Lexus RX | |
| Make | Volvo | Lexus |
| Model | XC90 | RX |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2011 |
| Body Type | SUV | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2435 cc | 3500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 160 HP | 275 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6200 RPM |
| Torque | 351 Nm | 348 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 4700 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2114 kg | 1895 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4770 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1885 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1720 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2741 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 7.5 L/100km | 9.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 11.9 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 73 L |
