2002 Westfield ZEI vs. 2010 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2010 Ford Mustang is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Westfield ZEI. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Westfield ZEI would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford Mustang (315 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 142 more horse power than 2002 Westfield ZEI. (173 HP @ 9800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2002 Westfield ZEI. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford Mustang weights approximately 931 kg more than 2002 Westfield ZEI. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Westfield ZEI | 2010 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Westfield | Ford |
Model | ZEI | Mustang |
Year Released | 2002 | 2010 |
Engine Size | 1299 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 173 HP | 315 HP |
Engine RPM | 9800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 672 kg | 1603 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3550 mm | 4778 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1877 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1060 mm | 1425 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2340 mm | 2720 mm |