2002 ZAZ Wagon vs. 2010 Citroen C4
To start off, 2010 Citroen C4 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 ZAZ Wagon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 ZAZ Wagon would be higher. At 1,560 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Citroen C4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Citroen C4 (112 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 62 more horse power than 2002 ZAZ Wagon. (50 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Citroen C4 should accelerate faster than 2002 ZAZ Wagon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Citroen C4 weights approximately 495 kg more than 2002 ZAZ Wagon. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 ZAZ Wagon | 2010 Citroen C4 | |
| Make | ZAZ | Citroen |
| Model | Wagon | C4 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1091 cc | 1560 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 50 HP | 112 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 1750 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 18.6:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 745 kg | 1240 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3830 mm | 4280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1640 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1760 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2330 mm | 2770 mm |
