2003 AC Aceca vs. 1958 Cadillac 62
To start off, 2003 AC Aceca is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,980 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 AC Aceca (301 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 112 more horse power than 1958 Cadillac 62. (189 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 1958 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 585 kg more than 2003 AC Aceca.
Compare all specifications:
2003 AC Aceca | 1958 Cadillac 62 | |
Make | AC | Cadillac |
Model | Aceca | 62 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1958 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4600 cc | 5980 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 301 HP | 189 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1510 kg | 2095 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 5640 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 3300 mm |