2003 AC Aceca vs. 1966 Alpine A 110
To start off, 2003 AC Aceca is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Alpine A 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Alpine A 110 would be higher. At 3,506 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 AC Aceca (350 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 301 more horse power than 1966 Alpine A 110. (49 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 1966 Alpine A 110. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 AC Aceca weights approximately 1034 kg more than 1966 Alpine A 110. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 AC Aceca | 1966 Alpine A 110 | |
| Make | AC | Alpine |
| Model | Aceca | A 110 |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 3506 cc | 956 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 350 HP | 49 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 65 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 81 mm | 72 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1610 kg | 576 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 3860 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1470 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1120 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2300 mm | 2140 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 38 L |
