2003 AC Aceca vs. 1966 DKW Munga
To start off, 2003 AC Aceca is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DKW Munga would be higher. At 3,506 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 AC Aceca (350 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 307 more horse power than 1966 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 1966 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 AC Aceca weights approximately 500 kg more than 1966 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 AC Aceca. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 AC Aceca | 1966 DKW Munga | |
Make | AC | DKW |
Model | Aceca | Munga |
Year Released | 2003 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3506 cc | 978 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 43 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 8.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1610 kg | 1110 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 3450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2300 mm | 2010 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 31 L |