2003 AC Aceca vs. 1966 Mercury Cyclone

To start off, 2003 AC Aceca is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Mercury Cyclone. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Mercury Cyclone would be higher. At 6,393 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Mercury Cyclone is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 AC Aceca (350 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 1966 Mercury Cyclone. (335 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 1966 Mercury Cyclone. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Mercury Cyclone weights approximately 22 kg more than 2003 AC Aceca.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Mercury Cyclone (579 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 179 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 AC Aceca. (400 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1966 Mercury Cyclone will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 AC Aceca.

Compare all specifications:

2003 AC Aceca 1966 Mercury Cyclone
Make AC Mercury
Model Aceca Cyclone
Year Released 2003 1966
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3506 cc 6393 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Horse Power 350 HP 335 HP
Engine RPM 6500 RPM 4800 RPM
Torque 400 Nm 579 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 3200 RPM
Engine Bore Size 83 mm 103 mm
Engine Stroke Size 81 mm 96 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 8.0:1 10.5:1
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 4 seats 4 seats
Vehicle Weight 1610 kg 1632 kg
Vehicle Length 4640 mm 4980 mm
Vehicle Width 1860 mm 1880 mm
Vehicle Height 1350 mm 1400 mm
Wheelbase Size 2300 mm 2950 mm