2003 AC Aceca vs. 1976 Mazda 616
To start off, 2003 AC Aceca is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Mazda 616. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Mazda 616 would be higher. At 3,506 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 AC Aceca (350 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 271 more horse power than 1976 Mazda 616. (79 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 1976 Mazda 616. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 AC Aceca weights approximately 700 kg more than 1976 Mazda 616. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 AC Aceca (400 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 276 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Mazda 616. (124 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2003 AC Aceca will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Mazda 616.
Compare all specifications:
2003 AC Aceca | 1976 Mazda 616 | |
Make | AC | Mazda |
Model | Aceca | 616 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3506 cc | 1586 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 79 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 400 Nm | 124 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 78.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81 mm | 83 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1610 kg | 910 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2300 mm | 2480 mm |