2003 AC Aceca vs. 1978 Mazda RX-3

To start off, 2003 AC Aceca is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Mazda RX-3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Mazda RX-3 would be higher. At 3,506 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 AC Aceca (350 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 250 more horse power than 1978 Mazda RX-3. (100 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 1978 Mazda RX-3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 AC Aceca weights approximately 760 kg more than 1978 Mazda RX-3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 AC Aceca (400 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 265 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Mazda RX-3. (135 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2003 AC Aceca will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Mazda RX-3.

Compare all specifications:

2003 AC Aceca 1978 Mazda RX-3
Make AC Mazda
Model Aceca RX-3
Year Released 2003 1978
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3506 cc 1963 cc
Engine Type V dual-disk rotary
Horse Power 350 HP 100 HP
Engine RPM 6500 RPM 7000 RPM
Torque 400 Nm 135 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 4000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1610 kg 850 kg
Vehicle Length 4640 mm 4090 mm
Vehicle Width 1860 mm 1600 mm
Vehicle Height 1350 mm 1380 mm
Wheelbase Size 2300 mm 2320 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 90 L 65 L