2003 AC Aceca vs. 1988 Suzuki Swift
To start off, 2003 AC Aceca is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Suzuki Swift. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Suzuki Swift would be higher. At 3,506 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2003 AC Aceca is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 AC Aceca. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1988 Suzuki Swift, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 AC Aceca | 1988 Suzuki Swift | |
| Make | AC | Suzuki |
| Model | Aceca | Swift |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1988 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3506 cc | 993 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 350 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 3590 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1360 mm |
