2003 AC Aceca vs. 1996 Ford Fiesta
To start off, 2003 AC Aceca is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Ford Fiesta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Ford Fiesta would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 AC Aceca weights approximately 165 kg more than 1996 Ford Fiesta.
Because 2003 AC Aceca is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 AC Aceca. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Ford Fiesta, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 AC Aceca | 1996 Ford Fiesta | |
| Make | AC | Ford |
| Model | Aceca | Fiesta |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4600 cc | 1297 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 301 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1510 kg | 1345 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2310 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 62 L |
