2003 AC Aceca vs. 1996 Mitsubishi Pajero

To start off, 2003 AC Aceca is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mitsubishi Pajero. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mitsubishi Pajero would be higher. At 3,506 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 AC Aceca (350 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 145 more horse power than 1996 Mitsubishi Pajero. (205 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 1996 Mitsubishi Pajero. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mitsubishi Pajero weights approximately 200 kg more than 2003 AC Aceca.

Because 1996 Mitsubishi Pajero is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 AC Aceca. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mitsubishi Pajero will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 AC Aceca (400 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 100 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mitsubishi Pajero. (300 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2003 AC Aceca will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mitsubishi Pajero.

Compare all specifications:

2003 AC Aceca 1996 Mitsubishi Pajero
Make AC Mitsubishi
Model Aceca Pajero
Year Released 2003 1996
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3506 cc 3497 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 350 HP 205 HP
Engine RPM 6500 RPM 5000 RPM
Torque 400 Nm 300 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 3000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Number of Doors 2 doors 3 doors
Vehicle Weight 1610 kg 1810 kg
Vehicle Length 4640 mm 4150 mm
Vehicle Width 1860 mm 1790 mm
Vehicle Height 1350 mm 1850 mm
Wheelbase Size 2300 mm 2430 mm