2003 AC Aceca vs. 1997 Ford Taurus
To start off, 2003 AC Aceca is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Ford Taurus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Ford Taurus would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2003 AC Aceca is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 AC Aceca. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Ford Taurus, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 AC Aceca | 1997 Ford Taurus | |
Make | AC | Ford |
Model | Aceca | Taurus |
Year Released | 2003 | 1997 |
Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4600 cc | 2962 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 301 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 5030 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2760 mm |