2003 AC Aceca vs. 2000 Ford Taurus
To start off, 2003 AC Aceca is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Taurus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Taurus would be higher. At 3,506 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 AC Aceca (350 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 196 more horse power than 2000 Ford Taurus. (154 HP @ 4900 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Taurus. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 AC Aceca weights approximately 133 kg more than 2000 Ford Taurus. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 AC Aceca is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 AC Aceca. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Ford Taurus, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 AC Aceca (400 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 156 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford Taurus. (244 Nm @ 3950 RPM). This means 2003 AC Aceca will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford Taurus.
Compare all specifications:
2003 AC Aceca | 2000 Ford Taurus | |
Make | AC | Ford |
Model | Aceca | Taurus |
Year Released | 2003 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3506 cc | 2967 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 154 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Torque | 400 Nm | 244 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3950 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 88.9 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81 mm | 78.7 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 9.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1610 kg | 1477 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 5030 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2300 mm | 3030 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 68 L |