2003 AC Aceca vs. 2001 Nissan MM
To start off, 2003 AC Aceca is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Nissan MM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Nissan MM would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 AC Aceca (301 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 148 more horse power than 2001 Nissan MM. (153 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 2001 Nissan MM. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Nissan MM weights approximately 325 kg more than 2003 AC Aceca.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 AC Aceca (407 Nm) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Nissan MM. (372 Nm). This means 2003 AC Aceca will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Nissan MM. 2001 Nissan MM has automatic transmission and 2003 AC Aceca has manual transmission. 2003 AC Aceca will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Nissan MM will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 AC Aceca | 2001 Nissan MM | |
| Make | AC | Nissan |
| Model | Aceca | MM |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4600 cc | 2956 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 301 HP | 153 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Torque | 407 Nm | 372 Nm |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1510 kg | 1835 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 3710 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 1530 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 106 L |
