2003 AC Aceca vs. 2001 Rover 75

To start off, 2003 AC Aceca is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Rover 75. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Rover 75 would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 AC Aceca (301 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 124 more horse power than 2001 Rover 75. (177 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 2001 Rover 75. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 AC Aceca weights approximately 280 kg more than 2001 Rover 75. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2003 AC Aceca is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 AC Aceca. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Rover 75, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 AC Aceca (407 Nm) has 82 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Rover 75. (325 Nm). This means 2003 AC Aceca will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Rover 75.

Compare all specifications: