2003 AC Aceca vs. 2001 Toyota RSC
To start off, 2003 AC Aceca is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Toyota RSC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Toyota RSC would be higher. At 4,164 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Toyota RSC is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 AC Aceca (350 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 156 more horse power than 2001 Toyota RSC. (194 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 2001 Toyota RSC. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 AC Aceca weights approximately 214 kg more than 2001 Toyota RSC. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2001 Toyota RSC is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 AC Aceca. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Toyota RSC will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 AC Aceca (400 Nm) has 116 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Toyota RSC. (284 Nm). This means 2003 AC Aceca will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Toyota RSC.
Compare all specifications:
2003 AC Aceca | 2001 Toyota RSC | |
Make | AC | Toyota |
Model | Aceca | RSC |
Year Released | 2003 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3506 cc | 4164 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 194 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 400 Nm | 284 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1610 kg | 1396 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4120 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1560 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1860 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2300 mm | 2510 mm |