2003 AC Aceca vs. 2002 Lotec C 1000
To start off, 2003 AC Aceca is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Lotec C 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Lotec C 1000 would be higher. At 5,500 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Lotec C 1000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Lotec C 1000 (843 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 493 more horse power than 2003 AC Aceca. (350 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Lotec C 1000 should accelerate faster than 2003 AC Aceca. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 AC Aceca weights approximately 524 kg more than 2002 Lotec C 1000.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Lotec C 1000 (990 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 590 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 AC Aceca. (400 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2002 Lotec C 1000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 AC Aceca.
Compare all specifications:
2003 AC Aceca | 2002 Lotec C 1000 | |
Make | AC | Lotec |
Model | Aceca | C 1000 |
Year Released | 2003 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 3506 cc | 5500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 843 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 400 Nm | 990 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1610 kg | 1086 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1150 mm |