2003 AC Aceca vs. 2005 Chevrolet Blazer
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Blazer is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 AC Aceca would be higher. At 4,292 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Blazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 AC Aceca (350 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 160 more horse power than 2005 Chevrolet Blazer. (190 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 2005 Chevrolet Blazer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 AC Aceca weights approximately 38 kg more than 2005 Chevrolet Blazer. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 AC Aceca (400 Nm) has 61 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Chevrolet Blazer. (339 Nm). This means 2003 AC Aceca will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Chevrolet Blazer.
Compare all specifications:
2003 AC Aceca | 2005 Chevrolet Blazer | |
Make | AC | Chevrolet |
Model | Aceca | Blazer |
Year Released | 2003 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3506 cc | 4292 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 190 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 400 Nm | 339 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 102 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 9.2:1 |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1610 kg | 1572 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2300 mm | 2690 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 72 L |