2003 AC Aceca vs. 2005 Toyota Camry
To start off, 2005 Toyota Camry is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 AC Aceca would be higher. At 3,506 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 AC Aceca (350 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 200 more horse power than 2005 Toyota Camry. (150 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 2005 Toyota Camry.
Because 2003 AC Aceca is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 AC Aceca. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Camry, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 AC Aceca (400 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 182 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Toyota Camry. (218 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2003 AC Aceca will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Toyota Camry.
Compare all specifications:
2003 AC Aceca | 2005 Toyota Camry | |
Make | AC | Toyota |
Model | Aceca | Camry |
Year Released | 2003 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3506 cc | 2361 cc |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 150 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 400 Nm | 218 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 88.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81 mm | 96 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 9.6:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1610 kg | 1610 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2300 mm | 2910 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 70 L |