2003 AC Aceca vs. 2006 BMW 320

To start off, 2006 BMW 320 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 AC Aceca would be higher. At 3,506 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 AC Aceca (350 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 182 more horse power than 2006 BMW 320. (168 HP @ 6100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 2006 BMW 320. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 BMW 320 weights approximately 5 kg more than 2003 AC Aceca.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 AC Aceca (400 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 190 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 BMW 320. (210 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2003 AC Aceca will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 BMW 320.

Compare all specifications:

2003 AC Aceca 2006 BMW 320
Make AC BMW
Model Aceca 320
Year Released 2003 2006
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3506 cc 2171 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 350 HP 168 HP
Engine RPM 6500 RPM 6100 RPM
Torque 400 Nm 210 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 3500 RPM
Engine Bore Size 83 mm 80 mm
Engine Stroke Size 81 mm 72 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 8.0:1 11.0:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline - Premium
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 4 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1610 kg 1615 kg
Vehicle Length 4640 mm 4490 mm
Vehicle Width 1860 mm 1760 mm
Vehicle Height 1350 mm 1380 mm
Wheelbase Size 2300 mm 2730 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 90 L 63 L