2003 AC Aceca vs. 2009 Cadillac DTS
To start off, 2009 Cadillac DTS is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 AC Aceca would be higher. At 4,565 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac DTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 AC Aceca (350 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 2009 Cadillac DTS. (271 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 2009 Cadillac DTS.
Because 2003 AC Aceca is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 AC Aceca. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac DTS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 AC Aceca (400 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 104 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Cadillac DTS. (296 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2003 AC Aceca will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Cadillac DTS.
Compare all specifications:
2003 AC Aceca | 2009 Cadillac DTS | |
Make | AC | Cadillac |
Model | Aceca | DTS |
Year Released | 2003 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3506 cc | 4565 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 271 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 400 Nm | 296 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1910 mm |