2003 AC Aceca vs. 2009 Chrysler Aspen
To start off, 2009 Chrysler Aspen is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 AC Aceca would be higher. At 4,701 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Chrysler Aspen is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 AC Aceca (350 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 51 more horse power than 2009 Chrysler Aspen. (299 HP @ 5650 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 2009 Chrysler Aspen.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 AC Aceca (400 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 70 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Chrysler Aspen. (330 Nm @ 3950 RPM). This means 2003 AC Aceca will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Chrysler Aspen.
Compare all specifications:
2003 AC Aceca | 2009 Chrysler Aspen | |
Make | AC | Chrysler |
Model | Aceca | Aspen |
Year Released | 2003 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3506 cc | 4701 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 299 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5650 RPM |
Torque | 400 Nm | 330 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3950 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1940 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1890 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2300 mm | 3030 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 57 L |