2003 AC Aceca vs. 2009 Jeep Wrangler

To start off, 2009 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 AC Aceca would be higher. At 3,778 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 AC Aceca (350 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 148 more horse power than 2009 Jeep Wrangler. (202 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 2009 Jeep Wrangler. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 433 kg more than 2003 AC Aceca.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 AC Aceca (400 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 79 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Jeep Wrangler. (321 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2003 AC Aceca will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Jeep Wrangler.

Compare all specifications:

2003 AC Aceca 2009 Jeep Wrangler
Make AC Jeep
Model Aceca Wrangler
Year Released 2003 2009
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3506 cc 3778 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Horse Power 350 HP 202 HP
Engine RPM 6500 RPM 5200 RPM
Torque 400 Nm 321 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 4000 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 8.0:1 9.6:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1610 kg 2043 kg
Vehicle Length 4640 mm 3890 mm
Vehicle Width 1860 mm 1880 mm
Vehicle Height 1350 mm 1810 mm
Wheelbase Size 2300 mm 2950 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 90 L 85 L