2003 AC Aceca vs. 2010 Audi R8
To start off, 2010 Audi R8 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 AC Aceca would be higher. At 4,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Audi R8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Audi R8 (420 HP @ 7800 RPM) has 70 more horse power than 2003 AC Aceca. (350 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Audi R8 should accelerate faster than 2003 AC Aceca.
Because 2010 Audi R8 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 AC Aceca. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Audi R8 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Audi R8 (429 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 29 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 AC Aceca. (400 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2010 Audi R8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 AC Aceca.
Compare all specifications:
2003 AC Aceca | 2010 Audi R8 | |
Make | AC | Audi |
Model | Aceca | R8 |
Year Released | 2003 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 3506 cc | 4200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 420 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 7800 RPM |
Torque | 400 Nm | 429 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4435 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1905 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1252 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2300 mm | 2649 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 90 L |