2003 AC Aceca vs. 2011 Nissan Micra
To start off, 2011 Nissan Micra is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 AC Aceca would be higher. At 3,506 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 AC Aceca (350 HP) has 271 more horse power than 2011 Nissan Micra. (79 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2003 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 2011 Nissan Micra.
Because 2003 AC Aceca is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 AC Aceca. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Nissan Micra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 AC Aceca (400 Nm) has 292 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Nissan Micra. (108 Nm). This means 2003 AC Aceca will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Nissan Micra.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 AC Aceca | 2011 Nissan Micra | |
| Make | AC | Nissan |
| Model | Aceca | Micra |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3506 cc | 1200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 350 HP | 79 HP |
| Torque | 400 Nm | 108 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1666 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1514 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2300 mm | 2449 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 46 L |
