2003 AC Cobra vs. 1964 Seat 1500
To start off, 2003 AC Cobra is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Seat 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Seat 1500 would be higher. At 3,506 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 AC Cobra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 AC Cobra (350 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 279 more horse power than 1964 Seat 1500. (71 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 AC Cobra should accelerate faster than 1964 Seat 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Seat 1500 weights approximately 98 kg more than 2003 AC Cobra.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 AC Cobra | 1964 Seat 1500 | |
| Make | AC | Seat |
| Model | Cobra | 1500 |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3506 cc | 1481 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 350 HP | 71 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1062 kg | 1160 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4210 mm | 4470 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1210 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2300 mm | 2660 mm |
