2003 AC Cobra vs. 1968 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2003 AC Cobra is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 7,010 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 AC Cobra (350 HP) has 15 more horse power than 1968 Ford Mustang. (335 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2003 AC Cobra should accelerate faster than 1968 Ford Mustang.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 Ford Mustang (597 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 197 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 AC Cobra. (400 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1968 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 AC Cobra.
Compare all specifications:
2003 AC Cobra | 1968 Ford Mustang | |
Make | AC | Ford |
Model | Cobra | Mustang |
Year Released | 2003 | 1968 |
Body Type | Roadster | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3506 cc | 7010 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 335 HP |
Torque | 400 Nm | 597 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 105 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81 mm | 101.2 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 10.6:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4210 mm | 4670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2300 mm | 2750 mm |