2003 AC Cobra vs. 1968 Jaguar E Type
To start off, 2003 AC Cobra is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Jaguar E Type. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Jaguar E Type would be higher. At 4,235 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Jaguar E Type is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 AC Cobra (350 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 124 more horse power than 1968 Jaguar E Type. (226 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 AC Cobra should accelerate faster than 1968 Jaguar E Type. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Jaguar E Type weights approximately 338 kg more than 2003 AC Cobra.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 AC Cobra | 1968 Jaguar E Type | |
Make | AC | Jaguar |
Model | Cobra | E Type |
Year Released | 2003 | 1968 |
Body Type | Roadster | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3506 cc | 4235 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 226 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 92.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81 mm | 106 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1062 kg | 1400 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4210 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1210 mm | 1190 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2300 mm | 2450 mm |